Bed Nuclei Of The Stria Terminalis Posterior Division Strial Extension (BSTse) |
Swanson-1992 |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: these brain regions do not differ from one atlas version to the other. Therefore they are assumed to be identical. |
Mihail Bota |
Bed Nuclei Of The Stria Terminalis Strial Extension (BSTse) |
Swanson-2004 |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: Swanson 2004 nomenclature is very similar to Swanson 1998 version. For changes that were performed between Swanson 1998 and 2004 versions, please check "Changes to the original Atlas" , page 7. |
Mihail Bota |
Bed Nucleus Of Stria Terminalis, Supracapsular Part (BSTS) |
Paxinos/Watson-1998 |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: Swanson 2004 nomenclature is very similar to Swanson 1998 version. For changes that were performed between Swanson 1998 and 2004 versions, please check "Changes to the original Atlas" , page 7. |
Mihail Bota |
Bed Nucleus Of The Stria Terminalis Supracapsular Par (BSTS) |
de Olmos - 1995 |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: this relation is extracted from Figure 2 page 197. Details about the comparison can be found in cited references. BST supracapsular defined in Alheid nomenclature appears in relation only with BSTse, therefore it was assumed these two nuclei are identical. |
Mihail Bota |
Supracapsular Subnucleus Of Bed Nucleus Of Stria Terminalis (BSTSC) |
Moga-Fulwiler-Saper |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: see Table 1, page 197. |
Mihail Bota |
Bed Nucleus Of Stria Terminalis, Supracapsular Part (BSTS) |
Paxinos/Watson-1998 |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: this relation is extracted from Figure 2 page 197. Details about the comparison can be found in cited references. BSTse and BSTS appear only in this topological relationship, therefore it was assumed these nuclei are identical. |
Mihail Bota |
Supracapsular Subnucleus Of Bed Nucleus Of Stria Terminalis (BSTSC) |
Moga-Fulwiler-Saper |
equivalentClass |
Collator note: this relation is extracted from Figure 2 page 197. Details about the comparison can be found in cited references. BSTsc appears only in this relationship, therefore these two nuclei are assumed identical. |
Mihail Bota |